State v. Newsome

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Newsome

187 So. 3d 985, 2016 La. LEXIS 711, 2016 WL 1175621

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 24, 2016·No. No. 2016-KK-0022·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

hWrit Granted.

For the reasons assigned by Judge Dennis R. Bagneris, Sr. in his dissent in State v. Newsome, 15-1117 (La.App. 4 Cir. 12/10/15) (an unpublished writ action) (Bagneris, J., dissenting), we grant the state’s writ application and reverse the ruling of the trial court, which granted the defendants’ motion to suppress evidence. We hereby deny the defendants’ motion to suppress evidence. This matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

REVERSED, MOTION DENIED, AND REMANDED.

JOHNSON, C.J. would deny the writ application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

hWrit Granted.

For the reasons assigned by Judge Dennis R. Bagneris, Sr. in his dissent in State v. Newsome, 15-1117 (La.App. 4 Cir. 12/10/15) (an unpublished writ action) (Bagneris, J., dissenting), we grant the state’s writ application and reverse the ruling of the trial court, which granted the defendants’ motion to suppress evidence. We hereby deny the defendants’ motion to suppress evidence. This matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

REVERSED, MOTION DENIED, AND REMANDED.

JOHNSON, C.J. would deny the writ application.

State v. Newsome, 187 So. 3d 985, 2016 La. LEXIS 711, 2016 WL 1175621 (La. 2016).

Pincite

187 So. 3d 985 (State v. Newsome) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related