State v. Newman

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Newman

513 S.W.3d 369, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1287, 2016 WL 7388619

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 20, 2016

DocketNo. ED 101773

StatusPublished

This text of 513 S.W.3d 369 (State v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Newman, 513 S.W.3d 369, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1287, 2016 WL 7388619 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vincent Newman appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of one count of first-degree robbery, one count of first-degree assault, and two counts of armed criminal action. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, how[370]*370ever, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vincent Newman appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of one count of first-degree robbery, one count of first-degree assault, and two counts of armed criminal action. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, how[370]*370ever, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

513 S.W.3d 369, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1287, 2016 WL 7388619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-newman-moctapp-2016.