State v. Newlon

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Newlon

356 S.W.3d 224, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1341, 2011 WL 4944301

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 2011·No. ED 95348·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On August 5, 2010, following a trial by jury, Kelvin Newlon (“Defendant”) was found guilty of sexual misconduct involving a child. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On August 5, 2010, following a trial by jury, Kelvin Newlon (“Defendant”) was found guilty of sexual misconduct involving a child. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Newlon, 356 S.W.3d 224, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1341, 2011 WL 4944301 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

356 S.W.3d 224 (State v. Newlon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.