State v. Newlon

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Newlon

356 S.W.3d 224, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1341, 2011 WL 4944301

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 18, 2011

DocketED 95348

StatusPublished

This text of 356 S.W.3d 224 (State v. Newlon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Newlon, 356 S.W.3d 224, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1341, 2011 WL 4944301 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On August 5, 2010, following a trial by jury, Kelvin Newlon (“Defendant”) was found guilty of sexual misconduct involving a child. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On August 5, 2010, following a trial by jury, Kelvin Newlon (“Defendant”) was found guilty of sexual misconduct involving a child. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

356 S.W.3d 224, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1341, 2011 WL 4944301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-newlon-moctapp-2011.