State v. Newer

7 Blackf. 307, 1844 Ind. LEXIS 150
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 7, 1844
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 7 Blackf. 307 (State v. Newer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Newer, 7 Blackf. 307, 1844 Ind. LEXIS 150 (Ind. 1844).

Opinion

Dewet, J.

— This was a prosecution against a licensed grocery keeper for selling spirituous liquor to an intoxicated person. The indictment was found at the September term, [308]*3081841, of the Fountain Circuit Court. The defendant pleaded in abatement, that the grand jurors, who found the indictment, were selected by the board of commissioners of Fountain county on the sixth day of May, 1841; and that they were not authorized by law to make such selection, or do any other county business, on that day. Demurrer to the plea overruled, and the indictment quashed.

S. C. Willson, for the state.

By the law in force when the grand jurors in question were selected, the board doing county business in each county, was required to select grand and petit jurors at'the May session, which was to be held on the first Monday of that month, and might continue for five days. R. S. 1838, pp. 358, 151. No statute, exempting the county of Fountain from the operation of this general provision, has been pointed out to us ; and we know of none. The plea does not show that the 6th of May, the day on which the grand jurors were selected, was not included in the May term” of the board of commissioners, and is, therefore, bad. The general allegation, that the commissioners had no authority to make the selection on that day, is too vague for a plea in abatement. The board was authorized to select the grand jurors at the May session, which might, for aught that appeal’s, have embraced the day on which the selection was made. The demurrer should have been sustained.

Per Curiam,.

— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lauder
46 N.W. 956 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1890)
Lawrence v. Commonwealth
10 S.E. 840 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1890)
United States v. Reeves
27 F. Cas. 750 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana, 1878)
Dolan v. . People
64 N.Y. 485 (New York Court of Appeals, 1876)
United States v. Williams
28 F. Cas. 666 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Missouri, 1871)
Hardin v. State
22 Ind. 347 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1864)
Wilburn v. State
21 Ark. 198 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1860)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Blackf. 307, 1844 Ind. LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-newer-ind-1844.