State v. Newell

Supreme Court of Vermont

State v. Newell

45 A. 1045, 71 Vt. 476, 1899 Vt. LEXIS 219

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedJuly 28, 1899

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 45 A. 1045 (State v. Newell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Newell, 45 A. 1045, 71 Vt. 476, 1899 Vt. LEXIS 219 (Vt. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Start, J.

The respondent was convicted of the crime of intoxication before the Burlington city court and sentenced to pay a fine and costs of prosecution, and thereupon took an appeal to the March term, 1899, of the Chittenden county court. The court convened on the 8th day of March, 1899, and, on the 18th day of March, 1899, the respondent asked leave to enter his appeal. The court ruled that the appeal should have been entered on the first day of the term, and, as a matter of law, denied the respondent’s motion. As we construe the exceptions, the court below ryled, as a matter of law, that the appeal could not be entered after the first day of the term. This was error. On the first day of the term, the respondent could enter his appeal as a matter of right, and the court, in its discretion, could have allowed him to do so at any time thereafter during the term. Bennet v. Whitney, 1 Tyler 59; Miller v. Goold, 2 Tyler 405. The respondent has a right to have the court below exercise its discretion and say whether, under the circumstances, he ought to be allowed to enter his appeal; and, for this purpose, the cause must be remanded. Johnson v. Shumway, 65 Vt. 389; Ranney v. St.J. & L. C. R. R., Co., 67 Vt. 594.

Exceptions sustained and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Start, J.

The respondent was convicted of the crime of intoxication before the Burlington city court and sentenced to pay a fine and costs of prosecution, and thereupon took an appeal to the March term, 1899, of the Chittenden county court. The court convened on the 8th day of March, 1899, and, on the 18th day of March, 1899, the respondent asked leave to enter his appeal. The court ruled that the appeal should have been entered on the first day of the term, and, as a matter of law, denied the respondent’s motion. As we construe the exceptions, the court below ryled, as a matter of law, that the appeal could not be entered after the first day of the term. This was error. On the first day of the term, the respondent could enter his appeal as a matter of right, and the court, in its discretion, could have allowed him to do so at any time thereafter during the term. Bennet v. Whitney, 1 Tyler 59; Miller v. Goold, 2 Tyler 405. The respondent has a right to have the court below exercise its discretion and say whether, under the circumstances, he ought to be allowed to enter his appeal; and, for this purpose, the cause must be remanded. Johnson v. Shumway, 65 Vt. 389; Ranney v. St.J. & L. C. R. R., Co., 67 Vt. 594.

Exceptions sustained and cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A. 1045, 71 Vt. 476, 1899 Vt. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-newell-vt-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack