State v. New Jersey State Highway Commission
This text of 153 A. 251 (State v. New Jersey State Highway Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The prosecutor was a junior inspector in the state highway department. On October 31st, 1928, he was discharged and seeks by certiorari to review this action. The application for the writ was made in February of 1930. The rule was continued and the application was submitted to the Supreme Court in October last on briefs and a meagre stipulation of facts.
It is to be noted that the prosecutor failed to take any steps for a review of the action of the commission for more than a year. The failure for so long to apply for & certiorari, wtihout any excuse, is unreasonable and the rule will be discharged. Glori v. Board of Police Commissioners, 72 N. J. L. 131.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 A. 251, 9 N.J. Misc. 186, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-new-jersey-state-highway-commission-nj-1931.