State v. Neves
Opinion
The defendant Kenneth Elman Neves was convicted of the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon and appeals.
Defendant assigns as error the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury in accordance with two of his requested instructions.
[56] An examination of the record discloses that the requested instructions were improper statements of the law as they related to the facts in controversy.
Defendant also apparently complains of an instruction given by the trial court. Defendant did not except to the instruction as given. However, we have examined the instruction and find it a correct statement of the law.
Finding no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
423 P.2d 773 (State v. Neves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.