State v. Nevels

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Nevels

848 S.W.2d 511, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 139, 1993 WL 18451

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Nevels. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 109 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 2, 1993·No. No. 61684·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a plea bargain, Defendant pled guilty to delivery of cocaine, a class B felony. Subsequently, she filed a timely motion to withdraw her guilty plea pursuant to Rule 29.07(d). She appeals from the trial court’s denial of that motion. We affirm per Rule 30.25(b). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished a memorandum • for their information only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a plea bargain, Defendant pled guilty to delivery of cocaine, a class B felony. Subsequently, she filed a timely motion to withdraw her guilty plea pursuant to Rule 29.07(d). She appeals from the trial court’s denial of that motion. We affirm per Rule 30.25(b). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished a memorandum • for their information only.

State v. Nevels, 848 S.W.2d 511, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 139, 1993 WL 18451 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

848 S.W.2d 511 (State v. Nevels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.