State v. Neuroth

639 So. 2d 625, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5297, 1994 WL 234362
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 1, 1994
DocketNo. 92-2973
StatusPublished

This text of 639 So. 2d 625 (State v. Neuroth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Neuroth, 639 So. 2d 625, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5297, 1994 WL 234362 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on the authority of Metcalf v. State, 635 So.2d 11 (Fla.1994).

AFFIRMED.

DELL, C.J., and STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Metcalf v. State
635 So. 2d 11 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 So. 2d 625, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5297, 1994 WL 234362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-neuroth-fladistctapp-1994.