State v. Nelson

70 S.E. 445, 88 S.C. 125, 1911 S.C. LEXIS 100
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 11, 1911·No. 7818·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

Where there is any testimony tending to show that a defendant, on trial for crime, was at the time of the alleged offense, under the age of fourteen years, it is error to refuse to charge that one under founteen years of age is presumed to be incapable of committing crime, and the State must remove such presumption. State v. Toney, 15 S. C. 414; State v. Coleman, 54 S. C. 162, 31 S. E. 866. This does not mean that there must be direct and positive evidence of the fact of capacity independent and outside of the facts and circumstances of the transaction involved. But the question of capacity should be submitted to the jury under all the facts and circumstances in evidence. State v. Toney, supra.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Nelson, 70 S.E. 445, 88 S.C. 125, 1911 S.C. LEXIS 100 (S.C. 1911).

70 S.E. 445 (State v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slocumb v. State
522 S.E.2d 809 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1999)