State v. Nelson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Nelson

72 P.3d 1066, 188 Or. App. 657, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 901

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJuly 16, 2003

Docket020868461; A119106

StatusPublished

This text of 72 P.3d 1066 (State v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Nelson, 72 P.3d 1066, 188 Or. App. 657, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 901 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals his involuntary civil commitment on the ground that no nonhearsay evidence supports the trial court’s conclusion that he suffers from a mental disorder that renders him unable to provide for his basic personal needs. ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence in the record is insufficient to meet the requisite “clear and convincing” evidentiary standard. We accept the state’s concession that the evidence was insufficient to support appellant’s commitment.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals his involuntary civil commitment on the ground that no nonhearsay evidence supports the trial court’s conclusion that he suffers from a mental disorder that renders him unable to provide for his basic personal needs. ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence in the record is insufficient to meet the requisite “clear and convincing” evidentiary standard. We accept the state’s concession that the evidence was insufficient to support appellant’s commitment.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 P.3d 1066, 188 Or. App. 657, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nelson-orctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack