State v. Nelson

539 N.W.2d 442, 248 Neb. 817, 1995 Neb. LEXIS 214
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 17, 1995
DocketNo. S-94-794
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 539 N.W.2d 442 (State v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Nelson, 539 N.W.2d 442, 248 Neb. 817, 1995 Neb. LEXIS 214 (Neb. 1995).

Opinion

White, C.J.

This case involves an appeal from a conviction of driving while under the influence of alcohol (DWI), third offense, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-6,196 (Reissue 1993). The defendant, Douglas F. Nelson, contends that his two prior convictions, imposed under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Cum. Supp. 1986 & Supp. 1987), cannot be used to enhance his DWI sentence under § 60-6,196. On appeal to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, the court held that § 60-6,196 is a mere affirmance of § 39-669.07 and that the prior convictions can be used for enhancement purposes under § 60-6,196. State v. Nelson, 95 NCA No. 17, case No. A-94-794 (not designated for permanent publication). Nelson successfully petitioned this court for further review.

Our recent decision in State v. Sundling, ante p. 732, 538 N.W.2d 749 (1995), is controlling. Sundling held that [818]*818§ 60-6,196 is a mere affirmance and continuation of § 39-669.07 and that convictions under § 39-669.07 can be used to enhance the penalty for a DWI conviction under § 60-6,196. Therefore, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Engleman
560 N.W.2d 851 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 N.W.2d 442, 248 Neb. 817, 1995 Neb. LEXIS 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nelson-neb-1995.