State v. Nelson

278 S.W.3d 717, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 694, 2009 WL 792079
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 24, 2009·No. ED 90818·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alexander Nelson (“defendant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court on his conviction for unlawful possession of an illegal weapon, two counts of first degree robbery, and two counts of armed criminal action. Defendant claims the trial court erred in allowing the state to admit hearsay evidence at trial and in denying his motion to sever charges.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.15(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Nelson, 278 S.W.3d 717, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 694, 2009 WL 792079 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

278 S.W.3d 717 (State v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nelson v. State
372 S.W.3d 892 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)
State v. Smith
278 S.W.3d 717 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)