State v. Nefzger
This text of 2013 ND 163 (State v. Nefzger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 9/25/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2013 ND 163
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Robert James Nefzger, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20130085
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven E. McCullough, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Kara Schmitz Olson (argued), Assistant State’s Attorney, and Benjamin Sand (on brief), under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for plaintiff and appellee.
Jesse D. Matson, 417 Main Avenue, Suite 134, Fargo, N.D. 58103, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Nefzger
[¶1] Robert Nefzger appeals from a judgment entered after the district court denied his motion to suppress evidence and he entered a conditional guilty plea to drug-
related charges. Nefzger argues the officer who stopped him did so without any reasonable suspicion he was violating the law. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7), holding that the district court’s findings of fact are enough to conclude the officer had reasonable suspicion to stop Nefzger under State v. Skarsgard , 2007 ND 160, 739 N.W.2d 786.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 ND 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nefzger-nd-2013.