State v. Neely
219 S.E.2d 347, 288 N.C. 512, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 1025
This text of 219 S.E.2d 347 (State v. Neely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Neely, 219 S.E.2d 347, 288 N.C. 512, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 1025 (N.C. 1975).
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Willie Lee NEELY.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
James E. Ferguson, II, for defendant.
Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Sandra M. King, Associate Atty., for the State.
Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, 26 N.C.App. 707, 217 S.E.2d 94. Denied. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Neely
217 S.E.2d 94 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
219 S.E.2d 347, 288 N.C. 512, 1975 N.C. LEXIS 1025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-neely-nc-1975.