State v. Neeley
548 So. 2d 1165, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2127, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4957, 1989 WL 102536
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 8, 1989·No. No. 89-00244·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The state appeals a trial court’s order granting a motion to suppress cocaine seized from an automobile. We affirm and certify a question to the supreme court.
Katrina Neeley is a codefendant of Michael Abrams, whose case was decided this date by this court. See State v. Abrams, 548 So.2d 820 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), for a review of the facts and legal issues involved in both cases.
We affirm the trial court but, as in Abrams, certify the following question of great public importance to the supreme court:
IF A MOTOR VEHICLE IS LAWFULLY STOPPED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THE DRIVER CONSENTS TO THE OFFICER LOOKING INSIDE THE VEHICLE, DOES THE CONSENT GIVEN EXTEND TO THE SEARCH OF CLOSED CONTAINERS WITHIN THE VEHICLE WHICH ARE NEITHER LOCKED NOR SEALED?
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Neeley, 548 So. 2d 1165, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2127, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4957, 1989 WL 102536 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
548 So. 2d 1165 (State v. Neeley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jacobs v. State
733 So. 2d 552 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Wallace v. State
557 So. 2d 212 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)