State v. Neeland

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Neeland

119 So. 71, 167 La. 341, 1928 La. LEXIS 2056

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 26, 1928·No. No. 29598.·Published

Opinion

O’NIELL, C. J.

The defendant has appealed from a conviction and sentence for having intoxicating liquor in Ms possession for beverage purposes. There is no bill of exception in the record, nor assignment of error, nor error apparent on the face of the, record. It is quite likely that the appeal was taken merely to postpone payment of the penalty.

The verdict and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’NIELL, C. J.

The defendant has appealed from a conviction and sentence for having intoxicating liquor in Ms possession for beverage purposes. There is no bill of exception in the record, nor assignment of error, nor error apparent on the face of the, record. It is quite likely that the appeal was taken merely to postpone payment of the penalty.

The verdict and sentence are affirmed.

State v. Neeland, 119 So. 71, 167 La. 341, 1928 La. LEXIS 2056 (La. 1928).

Pincite

119 So. 71 (State v. Neeland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.