State v. Nealy

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Nealy

419 So. 2d 336, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2519

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedSeptember 2, 1982

DocketNo. 60980

StatusPublished

This text of 419 So. 2d 336 (State v. Nealy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Nealy, 419 So. 2d 336, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2519 (Fla. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We exercise our discretionary jurisdiction to review the decision below, Nealy v. State, 400 So.2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), because of direct conflict with decisions of other district courts of appeal.

We hold that the exclusionary rule embodied in article I, section 12, Florida Constitution, is applicable in probation revocation proceedings. State v. Dodd, 419 So.2d 333, (Fla.1982); Grubbs v. State, 373 So.2d 905 (Fla.1979).

We therefore approve the decision of the district court of appeal.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, A. C. J., and BOYD, OVER-TON, SUNDBERG and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI