State v. Nealy
419 So. 2d 336, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2519
Opinion
We exercise our discretionary jurisdiction to review the decision below, Nealy v. State, 400 So.2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), because of direct conflict with decisions of other district courts of appeal.
We hold that the exclusionary rule embodied in article I, section 12, Florida Constitution, is applicable in probation revocation proceedings. State v. Dodd, 419 So.2d 333, (Fla.1982); Grubbs v. State, 373 So.2d 905 (Fla.1979).
We therefore approve the decision of the district court of appeal.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Nealy, 419 So. 2d 336, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2519 (Fla. 1982).
419 So. 2d 336 (State v. Nealy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nealy v. State
400 So. 2d 95 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
State v. Dodd
419 So. 2d 333 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Grubbs v. State
373 So. 2d 905 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)