State v. Neal

789 N.E.2d 1119, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1438
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 11, 2003·No. 2003- 0128·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Champaign App. Nos. 2000CA16 and 2000CA18, 2002-Ohio-6786. Reported at 98 Ohio St.3d 1538, 2003-0hio-1946, 786 N.E.2d 901. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

O’Connor, J., would allow on Proposition of Law No. I. [1439]*1439Pfeifer, J., would allow. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Neal, 789 N.E.2d 1119, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1438 (Ohio 2003).

789 N.E.2d 1119 (State v. Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Dycus, Unpublished Decision (8-4-2005)
2005 Ohio 3990 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)