State v. . Neal
This text of 129 S.E. 926 (State v. . Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have examined tbe twenty-four assignments of error relied upon by defendant upon bis appeal to this Court. All are based upon exceptions to tbe admission or exclusion of evidence. There are no exceptions to tbe charge of tbe Court. Tbe assignments of error cannot be sustained. Tbe evidence submitted to tbe jury is ample to support tbe verdict. Tbe judgment is affirmed. There is
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 S.E. 926, 190 N.C. 871, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-neal-nc-1925.