State v. . Neal

129 S.E. 926, 190 N.C. 871, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 224
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 4, 1925
StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.E. 926 (State v. . Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Neal, 129 S.E. 926, 190 N.C. 871, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 224 (N.C. 1925).

Opinion

Pee CubiaM.

We have examined tbe twenty-four assignments of error relied upon by defendant upon bis appeal to this Court. All are based upon exceptions to tbe admission or exclusion of evidence. There are no exceptions to tbe charge of tbe Court. Tbe assignments of error cannot be sustained. Tbe evidence submitted to tbe jury is ample to support tbe verdict. Tbe judgment is affirmed. There is

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 S.E. 926, 190 N.C. 871, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-neal-nc-1925.