State v. Neal

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Neal

341 So. 2d 1131, 1977 La. LEXIS 4930

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 16, 1977

DocketNo. 59153

StatusPublished

This text of 341 So. 2d 1131 (State v. Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Neal, 341 So. 2d 1131, 1977 La. LEXIS 4930 (La. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Roy J. Neal applying for writ of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Ashby W. Pettigrew, Jr., Judge of the 32nd Judicial District Court for the Parish of Terre-bonne, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 1st day of March, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 20th day of May, 1977, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Roy J. Neal applying for writ of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Ashby W. Pettigrew, Jr., Judge of the 32nd Judicial District Court for the Parish of Terre-bonne, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 1st day of March, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 20th day of May, 1977, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

341 So. 2d 1131, 1977 La. LEXIS 4930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-neal-la-1977.