State v. Neal

551 So. 2d 935, 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 683
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedAugust 25, 1989
Docket1 Div. 819
StatusPublished

This text of 551 So. 2d 935 (State v. Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Neal, 551 So. 2d 935, 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 683 (Ala. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

PER CURIAM.

In compliance with the direction of the Supreme Court of Alabama in Ex parte Neal, 551 So.2d 933 (Ala.1989), the petition for writ of mandamus is granted. This case is remanded to the circuit court for proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

PETITION GRANTED.

All the Judges concur.

ON RETURN TO REMAND

Upon remand, the Circuit Court for Baldwin County held a hearing on the motion for a jury trial to determine the defendant’s competency to stand trial, which was the subject matter of Neal’s petition for writ of mandamus. The court’s actions render this petition moot, and it is hereby dismissed.

PETITION DISMISSED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neal v. State
551 So. 2d 933 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
551 So. 2d 935, 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-neal-alacrimapp-1989.