State v. Nash

234 S.W.3d 432, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 910, 2007 WL 1746906
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 19, 2007·No. ED 88334·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Julius Nash (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of forcible rape, two counts of forcible sodomy and one count of kidnapping. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that a reasonable juror could have found Appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Brooks, 158 S.W.3d 841, 847 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Nash, 234 S.W.3d 432, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 910, 2007 WL 1746906 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

234 S.W.3d 432 (State v. Nash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nash v. State
332 S.W.3d 928 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)