State v. Nash
This text of 234 S.W.3d 432 (State v. Nash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Julius Nash (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of forcible rape, two counts of forcible sodomy and one count of kidnapping. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that a reasonable juror could have found Appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Brooks, 158 S.W.3d 841, 847 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 S.W.3d 432, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 910, 2007 WL 1746906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nash-moctapp-2007.