State v. Nasberg
99 P. 940, 53 Or. 244, 1909 Ore. LEXIS 119
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an appeal from a judgment sentencing defendant to pay a fine for unlawfully dealing in and playing a gambling game known as “21,” contrary to the general laws on the subject, and presents the same question as in State v. Bay, 53 Or. 241 (99 Pac. 939). The conclusion there reached determines the points involved here, for which reason the judgment of the court below is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Nasberg, 99 P. 940, 53 Or. 244, 1909 Ore. LEXIS 119 (Or. 1909).
99 P. 940 (State v. Nasberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harlow v. Clow
223 P. 541 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1924)