State v. Narcarm
Opinion
The original complaint and warrant and the minutes indorsed upon the warrant were competent evidence of the former conviction. State v. Cox, post, p. 246.
The defendant could take advantage of the misnomer in the indictment only by a plea in abatement; and to such a plea a replication that he is known as well by one name as the other would be good. 1 Ch. Cr. L. 445,451; 1 Arch. Cr. L. & PI. 261, 262, n, 267; Whar. Am. Cr. L., ss. 536, 537; Rex v. Berriman, 5 C. & P. 601; Commonwealth v. Dedham, 16 Mass. 141, 147; Turns v. Commonwealth, 6 Met. 224; Commonwealth v. Fredericks, 119 Mass. 199; State v. Thompson, 20 N. H. 250.
Judgment, guilty.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
45 A. 744 (State v. Narcarm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.