State v. Narcarm

45 A. 744, 69 N.H. 237
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1897·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Carpenter, C. J.

The original complaint and warrant and the minutes indorsed upon the warrant were competent evidence of the former conviction. State v. Cox, post, p. 246.

The defendant could take advantage of the misnomer in the indictment only by a plea in abatement; and to such a plea a replication that he is known as well by one name as the other would be good. 1 Ch. Cr. L. 445,451; 1 Arch. Cr. L. & PI. 261, 262, n, 267; Whar. Am. Cr. L., ss. 536, 537; Rex v. Berriman, 5 C. & P. 601; Commonwealth v. Dedham, 16 Mass. 141, 147; Turns v. Commonwealth, 6 Met. 224; Commonwealth v. Fredericks, 119 Mass. 199; State v. Thompson, 20 N. H. 250.

Judgment, guilty.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Narcarm, 45 A. 744, 69 N.H. 237 (N.H. 1897).

45 A. 744 (State v. Narcarm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ackerman
144 A. 150 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1929)
Taylor v. Bushnell
35 Ohio C.C. Dec. 642 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1919)