State v. Narauska
This text of 488 A.2d 1391 (State v. Narauska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
The Defendant, Joseph N. Narauska, appeals from his conviction of obstructing government administration, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 751 (1983), following a jury trial in Superior Court (Penobscot County).
When the Defendant fails to provide us with a transcript of that trial, as is required by M.R.Crim.P. 39, we are unable to determine whether there may have been insufficient evidence to support his conviction, which the Defendant now asserts as his major point on appeal. See State v. Lord, 458 A.2d 432, 433 (Me.1983).
Accordingly, the entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 A.2d 1391, 1985 Me. LEXIS 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-narauska-me-1985.