State v. Narauska

488 A.2d 1391, 1985 Me. LEXIS 898
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided March 25, 1985·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

The Defendant, Joseph N. Narauska, appeals from his conviction of obstructing government administration, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 751 (1983), following a jury trial in Superior Court (Penobscot County).

When the Defendant fails to provide us with a transcript of that trial, as is required by M.R.Crim.P. 39, we are unable to determine whether there may have been insufficient evidence to support his conviction, which the Defendant now asserts as his major point on appeal. See State v. Lord, 458 A.2d 432, 433 (Me.1983).

Accordingly, the entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Narauska, 488 A.2d 1391, 1985 Me. LEXIS 898 (Me. 1985).

488 A.2d 1391 (State v. Narauska) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lord
458 A.2d 432 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1983)