State v. Naquin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Naquin

535 So. 2d 751, 1989 La. LEXIS 7, 1989 WL 1581

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 10, 1989

DocketNo. 88-KH-3105

StatusPublished

This text of 535 So. 2d 751 (State v. Naquin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Naquin, 535 So. 2d 751, 1989 La. LEXIS 7, 1989 WL 1581 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Naquin, Nelson; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 20662-KW; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 40083.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a request to purchase Boykin and sentencing transcripts he submitted via certified mail on August 29, 1988. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the request.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Naquin, Nelson; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 20662-KW; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 40083.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a request to purchase Boykin and sentencing transcripts he submitted via certified mail on August 29, 1988. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the request.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

535 So. 2d 751, 1989 La. LEXIS 7, 1989 WL 1581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-naquin-la-1989.