State v. Nance

117 S.E.2d 3, 253 N.C. 424, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 650
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 23, 1960·Published

Opinion

Pee CüRiam.

The defendant has filed) in this Court a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.

A motion for a new trial for newly discovered evidence in a criminal case may be made in the trial court only, at the trial term, or, in case of appeal, at the next succeeding term of the Superior Court after affirmance of the judgment by the Supreme Court. S. v. Casey, 201 N.C. 620, 161 S.E. 81; S. v. Edwards, 205 N.C. 661, 172 S.E. 399; S. v. Gibson, 229 N.C. 497, 50 S.E. 2d 520.

The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court below to grant his motion for judgment as of nonsuit made at the close [426] of the State’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence. In our opinion, the evidence was sufficient to take the case to the jury. This assignment of error is overruled.

No prejudicial error has been made to appear that in our opinion would justify the granting of a new trial.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Nance, 117 S.E.2d 3, 253 N.C. 424, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 650 (N.C. 1960).

117 S.E.2d 3 (State v. Nance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Edwards
172 S.E. 399 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
State v. . Casey
161 S.E. 81 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
State v. . Gibson
50 S.E.2d 520 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)