State v. Nakamitsu

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Nakamitsu. Read the opinion of the Court — 140 Haw. 157
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided June 6, 2016·No. SCWC-14-0001151·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0001151 06-JUN-2016 09:16 AM

SCWC-14-0001151

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAII,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

RYAN NAKAMITSU,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0001151; 1DTA-14-02783)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Ryan Nakamitsu’s application for writ of certiorari filed on April 25, 2016, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 6, 2016

Alen M. Kaneshiro /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Sonja P. McCullen for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Nakamitsu, (haw 2016).

State v. Nakamitsu (State v. Nakamitsu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.