State v. NAIM B.

927 A.2d 915, 283 Conn. 903
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 26, 2007
StatusPublished

This text of 927 A.2d 915 (State v. NAIM B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. NAIM B., 927 A.2d 915, 283 Conn. 903 (Colo. 2007).

Opinion

927 A.2d 915 (2007)
283 Conn. 903

STATE of Connecticut
v.
NA`IM B.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided June 26, 2007.

Timothy F. Costello, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Paul W. Summers, assistant public defender, and James B. Streeto, assistant public defender, in opposition.

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 101 Conn.App. 373, 921 A.2d 679 (2007), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that there was insufficient evidence to support the defendant's conviction of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21(a) (1)?"

ROGERS, C.J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17923.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Na'im B.
921 A.2d 679 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
927 A.2d 915, 283 Conn. 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-naim-b-conn-2007.