State v. Naegeli

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Naegeli

144 P.3d 1004, 208 Or. App. 331, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1454

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 27, 2006·No. 0506-66275; A129386·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this civil commitment case, appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that she suffers from a mental disorder, that she is a danger to herself, and that she is unable to provide for her basic needs and in entering judgment committing her to the Mental Health Division. The state concedes that the record does not support the judgment and that reversal is required. Based on our review of the record, we agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this civil commitment case, appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that she suffers from a mental disorder, that she is a danger to herself, and that she is unable to provide for her basic needs and in entering judgment committing her to the Mental Health Division. The state concedes that the record does not support the judgment and that reversal is required. Based on our review of the record, we agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

State v. Naegeli, 144 P.3d 1004, 208 Or. App. 331, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1454 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

144 P.3d 1004 (State v. Naegeli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.