State v. N. H.
This text of 332 Or. App. 563 (State v. N. H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No. 313 May 8, 2024 563
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
In the Matter of N. H., a Person Alleged to Have Intellectual Disabilities. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. N. H., Appellant. Marion County Circuit Court 22CC07263; A180662
Matthew L. Tracey, Judge pro tempore. Submitted March 20, 2024. Joseph DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jordan R. Silk, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Aoyagi, Presiding Judge, Joyce, Judge, and Jacquot, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. M. M.-B., 332 Or App 500, ___ P3d ___ (May 8, 2024).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
332 Or. App. 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-n-h-orctapp-2024.