State v. N. H.

451 P.3d 1027, 300 Or. App. 575
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 14, 2019·No. A169596·Published

Opinion

Submitted July 5, reversed November 14, 2019

In the Matter of N. H.,

a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness.

STATE OF OREGON,

Respondent,

v. N. H., Appellant.

Marion County Circuit Court 18CC02710; A169596

451 P3d 1027

Michael Newman, Senior Judge.

Alexander C. Cambier and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Patrick M. Ebbett, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Tookey, Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge.

PER CURIAM Reversed.

576 State v. N. H.

PER CURIAM Appellant challenges the order continuing appellant ’s commitment to the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.301; ORS 426.303; ORS 426.307. Appellant contends that the trial court erred because the record lacks clear and convincing evidence that appellant continues to be a person with a mental illness who is in need of further treatment. ORS 426.307; ORS 426.005(1)(f) (defining “person with mental illness”). The state concedes that the evidence was legally insufficient to support appellant’s continued commitment and that the order should be reversed. We agree and accept the state’s concession. Consequently, we reverse the order of continued commitment.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. N. H., 451 P.3d 1027, 300 Or. App. 575 (Or. Ct. App. 2019).

451 P.3d 1027 (State v. N. H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 426.301
Oregon § 426.301
§ 426.303
Oregon § 426.303
§ 426.307
Oregon § 426.307
§ 426.005
Oregon § 426.005