State v. N. A. M.
This text of 221 P.3d 800 (State v. N. A. M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to others and unable to provide for his basic needs as the result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. On de novo review, we agree and accept the state’s concession.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 P.3d 800, 232 Or. App. 208, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-n-a-m-orctapp-2009.