State v. N. A. M.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. N. A. M.

221 P.3d 800, 232 Or. App. 208, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1819

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 18, 2009·No. 080969264; A140204·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to others and unable to provide for his basic needs as the result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. On de novo review, we agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment committing him as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to others and unable to provide for his basic needs as the result of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence to support the involuntary commitment and that the trial court’s judgment should be reversed. On de novo review, we agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

State v. N. A. M., 221 P.3d 800, 232 Or. App. 208, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1819 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

221 P.3d 800 (State v. N. A. M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related