State v. Mysak

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Mysak

492 S.W.3d 667, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 661, 2016 WL 3538556

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 2016·No. WD 78384·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Per curiam:

Christopher Scott Mysak appeals his convictions of one count of statutory rape in the first degree, four counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree, and two counts of incest. Mysak claims that the tidal court abused its discretion in determining that a forensic interview was sufficiently reliable to be admitted pursuant to section 491.075, and plainly erred in failing to sua sponte declare a mistrial or correct the State during closing argument when the State discussed the law regarding voluntary intoxication. Finding no prejudicial error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Per curiam:

Christopher Scott Mysak appeals his convictions of one count of statutory rape in the first degree, four counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree, and two counts of incest. Mysak claims that the tidal court abused its discretion in determining that a forensic interview was sufficiently reliable to be admitted pursuant to section 491.075, and plainly erred in failing to sua sponte declare a mistrial or correct the State during closing argument when the State discussed the law regarding voluntary intoxication. Finding no prejudicial error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Mysak, 492 S.W.3d 667, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 661, 2016 WL 3538556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

492 S.W.3d 667 (State v. Mysak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.