State v. . Muse

107 S.E. 320, 181 N.C. 506, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 130
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 25, 1921
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 107 S.E. 320 (State v. . Muse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Muse, 107 S.E. 320, 181 N.C. 506, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 130 (N.C. 1921).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Superior Court must be affirmed on authority of S. v. Fore, 180 N. C., 744. A State statute in further- *507 anee of, and not in conflict with, the Federal prohibition law may be declared a valid exercise of the police power of the State and is sanctioned, in express terms, by the Eighteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Brame
116 S.E. 164 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)
State v. . Harrison
114 S.E. 830 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
State v. Campbell
182 N.C. 911 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)
Palmer v. State
133 N.E. 388 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 S.E. 320, 181 N.C. 506, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-muse-nc-1921.