State v. . Muse
107 S.E. 320, 181 N.C. 506, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 130
Opinion
The judgment of the Superior Court must be affirmed on authority of S. v. Fore, 180 N. C., 744. A State statute in further- *507 anee of, and not in conflict with, the Federal prohibition law may be declared a valid exercise of the police power of the State and is sanctioned, in express terms, by the Eighteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. . Muse, 107 S.E. 320, 181 N.C. 506, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 130 (N.C. 1921).
107 S.E. 320 (State v. . Muse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. . Brame
116 S.E. 164 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)
State v. . Harrison
114 S.E. 830 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
State v. Campbell
182 N.C. 911 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)
Palmer v. State
133 N.E. 388 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1921)