State v. Murry

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Murry

369 S.W.3d 85, 2012 WL 2322447, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 835

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 19, 2012·No. No. ED 97044·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David L. Murry (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered following his jury conviction for statutory rape in the second degree, Section 566.034 and statutory rape in the first degree, Section 566.032. Defendant contends the trial [86] court plainly erred in allowing the State to introduce evidence of other crimes and bad acts. We find the trial court committed no plain error.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David L. Murry (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered following his jury conviction for statutory rape in the second degree, Section 566.034 and statutory rape in the first degree, Section 566.032. Defendant contends the trial [86] court plainly erred in allowing the State to introduce evidence of other crimes and bad acts. We find the trial court committed no plain error.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 80.25(b).

State v. Murry, 369 S.W.3d 85, 2012 WL 2322447, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 835 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

369 S.W.3d 85 (State v. Murry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.