State v. Murray

782 P.2d 157, 308 Or. 496, 1989 Ore. LEXIS 548
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided November 16, 1989·No. TC 10-87-08999; CA A47865; SC S36382·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

*497 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Defendant petitions for review of a Court of Appeals decision affirming his convictions of murder and solicitation to murder. ORS 163.115; ORS 161.435. State v. Murray, 97 Or App 432, 775 P2d 930 (1989). Count 1 of the indictment charged alternative theories of murder, viz, intentional murder and felony murder. As concerns defendant’s murder conviction, this issue appears to be the same as that in State v. Boots, 308 Or 371, 780 P2d 725 (1989), i.e., whether the trial court correctly instructed the jury about the necessity for a unanimous verdict on a single murder theory.

The record here indicates that the trial court erred in instructing the jury. Accordingly, we reverse defendant’s murder conviction and remand to the trial court for further consideration in the light of State v. Boots, supra.

As concerns defendant’s criminal solicitation conviction, finding no error assigned or claimed as to that conviction, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court.

The petition for review is allowed. The circuit court’s judgment of conviction of criminal solicitation is affirmed. The circuit court’s judgment of conviction of murder is reversed. Remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings in the light of State v. Boots, 308 Or 371, 780 P2d 725 (1989).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Murray, 782 P.2d 157, 308 Or. 496, 1989 Ore. LEXIS 548 (Or. 1989).

782 P.2d 157 (State v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Madrigal CA5
California Court of Appeal, 2023
State v. Klinge
994 P.2d 509 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2000)
Ex Parte Madison
718 So. 2d 104 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1998)
Bouwkamp v. State
833 P.2d 486 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1992)
Schad v. Arizona
501 U.S. 624 (Supreme Court, 1991)