State v. Murray
165 A.2d 161, 33 N.J. 393, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 167
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Sullivan in the court below.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Erancis, Proctor, Hall and Sciiettiito — 5.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Murray, 165 A.2d 161, 33 N.J. 393, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 167 (N.J. 1960).
165 A.2d 161 (State v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Hunt v. State
625 S.W.2d 405 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)
State v. Blanchard
235 A.2d 913 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
State v. Homer
206 A.2d 905 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)
State v. Bruce
178 A.2d 233 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
State v. Travers
174 A.2d 747 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)