State v. Murray

732 So. 2d 500, 1999 WL 360172
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 28, 1999
Docket98-3072
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 732 So. 2d 500 (State v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Murray, 732 So. 2d 500, 1999 WL 360172 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

732 So.2d 500 (1999)

STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Jake MURRAY, Jr., Appellee.

No. 98-3072.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 28, 1999.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Dee Ball, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

*501 COBB, J.

The trial court declared the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act[1] unconstitutional and the state appeals. We reverse for the reasons set forth in Speed v. State, 732 So.2d 17 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

REVERSED.

GRIFFIN, C.J. and GOSHORN, J., concur.

NOTES

[1] See Ch. 97-239, Laws of Fla. (effective May 30, 1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murray v. State
776 So. 2d 272 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
732 So. 2d 500, 1999 WL 360172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-murray-fladistctapp-1999.