State v. Murr

642 N.E.2d 628, 71 Ohio St. 3d 168
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 14, 1994·No. No. 93-2399·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the decision.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. A.W. Sweeney and Wright, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Murr, 642 N.E.2d 628, 71 Ohio St. 3d 168 (Ohio 1994).

642 N.E.2d 628 (State v. Murr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.