State v. Murphy

39 Tex. 46
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1873
StatusPublished

This text of 39 Tex. 46 (State v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Murphy, 39 Tex. 46 (Tex. 1873).

Opinion

Walker, J.

An indictment for theft, which describes the stolen property as one head of neat cattle, of the value of $12, the property of C. C. Cooper, is good under our law. Perhaps, at common law greater strictness might have been required, inasmuch as the word cattle may include other domestic animals than those of the bovine genus. But in common parlance the word is restricted in its sense, and does not include sheep, goats, horses, mules, asses, and swine, although, strictly speaking, it does include all these domestic quadrupeds collectively. Shakespeare used it to include boys and women, in the line,

“Boys and women are, for the most part, cattle of this color.”

[47]*47We think, however, that this question was sensibly treated in The State v. Mansfield, 33 Texas, 129, and the analogy between that case is so close to the one at bar that we hold it as authority, and reverse and remand this •case.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Mansfield
33 Tex. 129 (Texas Supreme Court, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Tex. 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-murphy-tex-1873.