State v. Murphy

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Murphy

704 N.E.2d 1243, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1478, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 237

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 25, 1999

Docket98-1586

StatusPublished

This text of 704 N.E.2d 1243 (State v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Murphy, 704 N.E.2d 1243, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1478, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 237 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin C.P. No. 97CR052877. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motions to supplement the record and to stay the briefing schedule,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions to supplement the record and to stay the briefing schedule be, and hereby are, denied.

Resnick, J., would order the video to be transcribed and deny the continuance. Pfeifer, J., would grant the motion to supplement the record and deny the continuance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin C.P. No. 97CR052877. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motions to supplement the record and to stay the briefing schedule,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions to supplement the record and to stay the briefing schedule be, and hereby are, denied.

Resnick, J., would order the video to be transcribed and deny the continuance. Pfeifer, J., would grant the motion to supplement the record and deny the continuance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

704 N.E.2d 1243, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1478, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-murphy-ohio-1999.