State v. Murphy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Murphy

696 S.E.2d 527, 361 N.C. 164, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 1398

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 20, 2006·No. 485P05·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Attorney General’s petition for discretionary review is allowed, pursuant to our general supervisory authority under Article IV, Section 12 of the Constitution of North Carolina, for the limited purpose of (1) vacating that portion of the Court of Appeals opinion ordering remand to the trial court for resentencing and (2) remanding to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Timothy Earl Blackwell, 361 N.C. 41, - S.E.2d- (2006). The Court of Appeals opinion remains undisturbed in all other respects. Justice Timmons-Goodson recused.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 20th day of December, 2006.

s/Edmunds. J. For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Attorney General’s petition for discretionary review is allowed, pursuant to our general supervisory authority under Article IV, Section 12 of the Constitution of North Carolina, for the limited purpose of (1) vacating that portion of the Court of Appeals opinion ordering remand to the trial court for resentencing and (2) remanding to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Timothy Earl Blackwell, 361 N.C. 41, - S.E.2d- (2006). The Court of Appeals opinion remains undisturbed in all other respects. Justice Timmons-Goodson recused.

By Order of the Court in Conference, this 20th day of December, 2006.

s/Edmunds. J. For the Court

State v. Murphy, 696 S.E.2d 527, 361 N.C. 164, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 1398 (N.C. 2006).

Pincite

696 S.E.2d 527 (State v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related