State v. Murphy

348 N.W.2d 764, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1371
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJune 8, 1984
DocketNo. C1-82-271
StatusPublished

This text of 348 N.W.2d 764 (State v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Murphy, 348 N.W.2d 764, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1371 (Mich. 1984).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In State v. Murphy, 324 N.W.2d 340 (Minn.1982), we reversed the order of the Hennepin County District Court, which denied defendant’s motion to suppress a confession to his probation agent. Pursuant to the mandate of the United States Supreme Court in Minnesota v. Murphy, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1136, 79 L.Ed.2d 409 (1984), we hereby vacate the judgment and opinion of this court in State v. Murphy, 324 N.W.2d 340 (Minn.1982). The order of the district court is affirmed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Minnesota v. Murphy
465 U.S. 420 (Supreme Court, 1984)
State v. Murphy
324 N.W.2d 340 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 N.W.2d 764, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-murphy-minn-1984.