State v. Murphy
This text of 348 N.W.2d 764 (State v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
In State v. Murphy, 324 N.W.2d 340 (Minn.1982), we reversed the order of the Hennepin County District Court, which denied defendant’s motion to suppress a confession to his probation agent. Pursuant to the mandate of the United States Supreme Court in Minnesota v. Murphy, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1136, 79 L.Ed.2d 409 (1984), we hereby vacate the judgment and opinion of this court in State v. Murphy, 324 N.W.2d 340 (Minn.1982). The order of the district court is affirmed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
348 N.W.2d 764, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-murphy-minn-1984.