State v. Murdock

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Murdock

469 S.W.3d 919, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 918, 2015 WL 5435033

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 2015·No. ED 102085·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mitchell L. Murdock (Appellant) appeals from the judgment entered by the trial court upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of stealing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err in denying Appellant’s motions for acquittal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment [920] pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mitchell L. Murdock (Appellant) appeals from the judgment entered by the trial court upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of stealing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not err in denying Appellant’s motions for acquittal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment [920] pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Murdock, 469 S.W.3d 919, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 918, 2015 WL 5435033 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

469 S.W.3d 919 (State v. Murdock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.