State v. Murat

9 N.J.L. 3
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 15, 1827·Published

Opinion

Chief Justice.

There are divers instances in which this court has ordered special j uries for the Oyer and Terminer.

S. Stockton, as amicus curise, said he recollected many instances in which it had been done; but that he had always-entertained doubts as to the propriety of it.

Chief Justice. It has been the practice of the court. Therefore you may take a rule for a special jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Murat, 9 N.J.L. 3 (N.J. 1827).

9 N.J.L. 3 (State v. Murat) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.