State v. Muniz

479 P.3d 597, 308 Or. App. 837
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJanuary 27, 2021
DocketA169764
StatusPublished

This text of 479 P.3d 597 (State v. Muniz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Muniz, 479 P.3d 597, 308 Or. App. 837 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Submitted March 31, 2020, affirmed January 27, 2021

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ETHAN KIPLING MUNIZ, Defendant-Appellant. Clatsop County Circuit Court 18CR08086; A169764 479 P3d 597

Cindee S. Matyas, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Neil F. Byl, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Susan G. Howe, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and James, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Chorney-Phillips, 367 Or 355, 478 P3d 504 (2020).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Chorney-Phillips
478 P.3d 504 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
479 P.3d 597, 308 Or. App. 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-muniz-orctapp-2021.