State v. Mundzak

New Mexico Court of Appeals

State v. Mundzak

509 P.2d 271, 85 N.M. 79

CourtNew Mexico Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 13, 1973

DocketNo. 1084

StatusPublished

This text of 509 P.2d 271 (State v. Mundzak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mundzak, 509 P.2d 271, 85 N.M. 79 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

Following a plea of guilty, the defendant was sentenced for attempting to distribute a controlled substance (LSD). See §§ 40A-28-1, N.M.S.A.1953 (2nd Repl.Vol. 6) and 54-11-22, N.M.S.A.1953 (Int.Supp. 1972).

On this appeal, defendant contends that the judgment and sentence imposed are invalid because he did not understandingly and voluntarily enter his plea of guilty.

The record discloses nothing to support defendant’s contention.

Affirmed.

It is so ordered.

WOOD, C. J., and HENDLEY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI