State v. Mulu
This text of State v. Mulu (State v. Mulu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000645 28-OCT-2014 08:27 AM
SCWC-11-0000645
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
VICTOR F. MULU, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000645; CR. NO. 10-1-1218)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Court Judge Kim, in place of Wilson, J., recused)
Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee Victor F. Mulu’s
Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on September 20, 2014,
is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, October 28, 2014.
Stephen M. Shaw /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Donn Fudo for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Glenn J. Kim
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Mulu, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mulu-haw-2014.